郑晖,黄兢姚,黄宁,谢杭,林俊清,池桢,柯坤,严乐业,杨维竹.TIPS治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血预后影响因素分析[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2019,16(5):270-274
TIPS治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血预后影响因素分析
Prognostic factors of TIPS in treatment of gastroesophageal varices bleeding
投稿时间:2018-07-23  修订日期:2019-04-14
DOI:10.13929/j.1672-8475.201807028
中文关键词:  门体分流术,经颈静脉肝内  食管和胃静脉曲张  出血  预后
英文关键词:portosystemic shunt, transjugular intrahepatic  esophageal and gastric varices  hemorrhage  prognosis
基金项目:福建省微创医学中心建设项目(No.[2017]171)。
作者单位E-mail
郑晖 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
黄兢姚 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
黄宁 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
谢杭 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
林俊清 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
池桢 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
柯坤 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
严乐业 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001  
杨维竹 福建医科大学附属协和医院介入科, 福建 福州 350001 ywzjn2012@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1711
全文下载次数: 512
中文摘要:
      目的 分析影响TIPS治疗食管胃底静脉曲张出血(EGVB)预后的因素。方法 回顾性分析68例接受TIPS治疗的EGVB患者的资料。采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算术后累积生存率,不同患者间生存率比较采用log-rank检验。以Cox回归模型分析影响预后的因素,并以ROC曲线确定其预测经TIPS治疗后EGVB患者预后的最佳截点。结果 TIPS术后患者1、2、3年累积生存率分别为90.7%、82.2%和77.9%。患者年龄、术前血清白蛋白为影响TIPS治疗EGVB的预后因素。ROC曲线分析显示,以患者年龄、术前血清白蛋白评估EGVB患者TIPS术后1年生存预后的AUC分别为0.923(P=0.001)和0.183(P=0.011),年龄67.5岁为最佳截点。年龄≤ 67.5岁患者术后1年累积生存率明显高于年龄> 67.5岁者(96.4% vs 64.3%,χ2=10.785,P=0.001)。结论 年龄及术前血清白蛋白是预测TIPS治疗EGVB患者生存情况的独立因素;年龄> 67.5岁患者预后较差。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the prognostic factors of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in treatment of esophageal and gastric varices bleeding (EGVB). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 68 patients with EGVB who underwent TIPS. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative survival after treatment, and the differences of cumulative survival were compared using log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was carried out with Cox proportional hazards regression model, and ROC curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of prognostic factors. Results The 1-, 2-and 3-year survival rate was 90.7%, 82.2% and 77.9% respectively after TIPS procedures. Cox regression univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the age (P=0.009) and preoperative serum albumin (P=0.024) were independent prognostic factors. The area under the ROC curve of age for assessing whether the survival time more than 1 year was 0.923 (P=0.001), while that of preoperative serum albumin was 0.183 (P=0.011). Patient's age of 67.5 years was the optimal cut-off value. The 1-year cumulative survival rate of patients' aged ≤ 67.5 years was statistically significant higher than that of those older than 67.5 years (96.4% vs 64.3%, χ2=10.785, P=0.001). Conclusion Patients' age and preoperative serum albumin are independent predictors for the survival of EGVB after TIPS. Postoperative prognosis of patients' aged > 67.5 years is unfavorable.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭